Segall v. Mendlowitz

247 A.D. 878

This text of 247 A.D. 878 (Segall v. Mendlowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Segall v. Mendlowitz, 247 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

The action was brought to set aside certain chattel mortgages, assignments, agreements and promissory notes on the ground that these documents were delivered pursuant to two usurious agreements; and for other equitable relief. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, entered upon a decision after trial at Special Term, affirmed, with costs to the respondents Herman Mendlowitz and Herman Stark. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segall-v-mendlowitz-nyappdiv-1936.