Segall v. Mendlowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Segall v. Mendlowitz

247 A.D. 878

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The action was brought to set aside certain chattel mortgages, assignments, agreements and promissory notes on the ground that these documents were delivered pursuant to two usurious agreements; and for other equitable relief. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, entered upon a decision after trial at Special Term, affirmed, with costs to the respondents Herman Mendlowitz and Herman Stark. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The action was brought to set aside certain chattel mortgages, assignments, agreements and promissory notes on the ground that these documents were delivered pursuant to two usurious agreements; and for other equitable relief. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits, entered upon a decision after trial at Special Term, affirmed, with costs to the respondents Herman Mendlowitz and Herman Stark. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial.

Segall v. Mendlowitz, 247 A.D. 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 878 (Segall v. Mendlowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.