Segall Investment Co. v. Rosedale Delicatessen, Inc.

143 So. 441, 106 Fla. 578
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 441 (Segall Investment Co. v. Rosedale Delicatessen, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Segall Investment Co. v. Rosedale Delicatessen, Inc., 143 So. 441, 106 Fla. 578 (Fla. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Circuit Court should be quashed on authority of the opinion and judgment of this Court in the case of Miami Transit Company vs. George F. Stephens, filed at this Term o'f the Court.

It is so ordered.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 So. 441, 106 Fla. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segall-investment-co-v-rosedale-delicatessen-inc-fla-1932.