Segal v. Segal

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Segal v. Segal

783 A.2d 1030, 258 Conn. 927, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 447

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 10, 2001

DocketSC 16604

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 783 A.2d 1030 (Segal v. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Segal v. Segal, 783 A.2d 1030, 258 Conn. 927, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 447 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 17 (AC 19485), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the money judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor in Nevada is unenforceable in this state, despite the plaintiff debtor’s failure to comply with General Statutes § 52-606 (a), which requires proof that he has furnished security for the satisfaction of the Nevada judgment on appeal as required by Nevada law?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 17 (AC 19485), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the money judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor in Nevada is unenforceable in this state, despite the plaintiff debtor’s failure to comply with General Statutes § 52-606 (a), which requires proof that he has furnished security for the satisfaction of the Nevada judgment on appeal as required by Nevada law?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 A.2d 1030, 258 Conn. 927, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segal-v-segal-conn-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack