Segal v. Segal

783 A.2d 1030, 258 Conn. 927, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 447
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 10, 2001·No. SC 16604·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 17 (AC 19485), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the money judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor in Nevada is unenforceable in this state, despite the plaintiff debtor’s failure to comply with General Statutes § 52-606 (a), which requires proof that he has furnished security for the satisfaction of the Nevada judgment on appeal as required by Nevada law?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Segal v. Segal, 783 A.2d 1030, 258 Conn. 927, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 447 (Colo. 2001).

783 A.2d 1030 (Segal v. Segal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Segal v. Segal
863 A.2d 221 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2004)
Segal v. Segal
823 A.2d 1208 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)