Segal v. Eagle Building Co.

11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 481, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 349
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided May 21, 1907·Published

Opinion

As appears from the findings of fact the only question involved is whether, in a proceeding to sell real estate by an administrator to pay debts of decedent, heirs, who are idiots, are parties to the record, when not made parties to the petition but their legal guardian filed an answer in which she as such guardian expressly waived the issuing and service of summons upon her wards — admitted the allegations of the petition to be true and ask that the prayer of the petition be- granted? We think they are such parties and bound by the sale made. Ewing v. Hollister, 7 O. (pt. 2), 138; Section 6143, Revised Statutes.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Segal v. Eagle Building Co., 11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 481, 1907 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 349 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).

11 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 481 (Segal v. Eagle Building Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.