Segal v. Cab Transportation Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Segal v. Cab Transportation Corp.

16 A.D.2d 679, 227 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 679 (Segal v. Cab Transportation Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Segal v. Cab Transportation Corp., 16 A.D.2d 679, 227 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff wife, a passenger in a taxicab owned by defendant Cab Transportation Corp. and operated by defendant August Gruglimelli, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the taxicab was in a collision with an automobile owned and operated by defendant Philip Weisbrout; and by her husband to recover damages for the loss of her services and for medical expenses, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 1961, which vacated a preference theretofore granted by another Judge on March 30, 1960, pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated November 15, 1961, which in effect denied plaintiffs’ application to resettle the order of June 1, 1961, which again vacated the preference, and which recited the court’s finding that the plaintiff wife’s injuries “ were not serious, prolonged or permanent”. Order of June 1, 1961, and order of November 15, 1961, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiff wife, a passenger in a taxicab owned by defendant Cab Transportation Corp. and operated by defendant August Gruglimelli, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when the taxicab was in a collision with an automobile owned and operated by defendant Philip Weisbrout; and by her husband to recover damages for the loss of her services and for medical expenses, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 1, 1961, which vacated a preference theretofore granted by another Judge on March 30, 1960, pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules; and (2) from an order of the same court, dated November 15, 1961, which in effect denied plaintiffs’ application to resettle the order of June 1, 1961, which again vacated the preference, and which recited the court’s finding that the plaintiff wife’s injuries “ were not serious, prolonged or permanent”. Order of June 1, 1961, and order of November 15, 1961, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 679, 227 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segal-v-cab-transportation-corp-nyappdiv-1962.