Sefton v. Board of Conservation & Development
132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 466, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 197
This text of 132 A. 923 (Sefton v. Board of Conservation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sefton v. Board of Conservation & Development, 132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 466, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 197 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
132 A. 923, 102 N.J.L. 466, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sefton-v-board-of-conservation-development-nj-1926.