Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

DecidedJune 25, 2015

Docket319934

StatusUnpublished

This text of Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

STATE OF MICHIGAN

COURT OF APPEALS

SEFIKA ADEMI, UNPUBLISHED June 25, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellant,

v No. 319934 Kent Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No. 12-002714-NF INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees, and

LANCER INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ.

SHAPIRO, J. (concurring).

If the applicable standard of review were de novo, I would conclude that the economist’s report provided to defendant constituted reasonable proof as to economic losses. However, the issue is close and I cannot conclude that the trial court’s findings, made after conducting a full bench trial, were clearly erroneous. See Arbor Farms, LLC v GeoStar Corp, 305 Mich App 374, 386-387; 853 NW2d 421 (2014). Accordingly, I concur.

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro

-1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI