Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Opinion
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
SEFIKA ADEMI, UNPUBLISHED June 25, 2015
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v No. 319934 Kent Circuit Court
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No. 12-002714-NF INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
LANCER INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
Before: BECKERING, P.J., and MARKEY and SHAPIRO, JJ.
SHAPIRO, J. (concurring).
If the applicable standard of review were de novo, I would conclude that the economist’s report provided to defendant constituted reasonable proof as to economic losses. However, the issue is close and I cannot conclude that the trial court’s findings, made after conducting a full bench trial, were clearly erroneous. See Arbor Farms, LLC v GeoStar Corp, 305 Mich App 374, 386-387; 853 NW2d 421 (2014). Accordingly, I concur.
/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Sefika Ademi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.