Seferi v. Ives
391 U.S. 359, 88 S. Ct. 1665, 20 L. Ed. 2d 640, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1637
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seferi v. Ives, 391 U.S. 359, 88 S. Ct. 1665, 20 L. Ed. 2d 640, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1637 (1968).
391 U.S. 359 (Seferi v. Ives) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLC
894 A.2d 259 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Gte California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
39 F.3d 940 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Wronowski v. Redevelopment Agency
430 A.2d 1284 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1980)
Laurel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Transportation
428 A.2d 789 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1980)
Feigenbaum v. New Britain Housing Site Development Agency
320 A.2d 824 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1973)
Brothers, Inc. v. Ansonia Redevelopment Agency
255 A.2d 836 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)
Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Standard Oil Co. Of Texas
391 U.S. 366 (Supreme Court, 1968)