Seewald v. Raynolds

New Mexico Supreme Court

Seewald v. Raynolds

3 N.M. 344

DecidedJanuary 18, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.M. 344 (Seewald v. Raynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seewald v. Raynolds, 3 N.M. 344 (N.M. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Brinker, J.

This was an action in chancery to foreclose a mort-gage. It was argued and submitted with the case of Milligan v. Cromwell, ante, 327. The facts are in all respects, except as to parties, .property, and amount involved, the same as those in Milligan s. Cromwell. The principles considered therein under the first assignment -of error apply to this case. For the reasons stated in that ease the judgment herein should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Long, C. J., and Henderson, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brinker, J.

This was an action in chancery to foreclose a mort-gage. It was argued and submitted with the case of Milligan v. Cromwell, ante, 327. The facts are in all respects, except as to parties, .property, and amount involved, the same as those in Milligan s. Cromwell. The principles considered therein under the first assignment -of error apply to this case. For the reasons stated in that ease the judgment herein should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Long, C. J., and Henderson, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.M. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seewald-v-raynolds-nm-1886.