Seevers v. Montiel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seevers v. Montiel

73 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17221, 2011 WL 5120146

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2011·No. No. 1D11-0371·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lois M. Seevers, seeks review of the trial court’s Supplemental Final Judgment of Attorney’s Fees and Costs and raises several arguments on appeal, only one of which has merit. Because we agree with Appellant that the trial court’s judgment failed to take into account Appellee’s attorneys’ concession that 5.25 hours should be deducted from the amount claimed, we reverse the judgment and remand with instructions that the trial court enter an amended judgment deducting $2,375 from the attorney’s fee award.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lois M. Seevers, seeks review of the trial court’s Supplemental Final Judgment of Attorney’s Fees and Costs and raises several arguments on appeal, only one of which has merit. Because we agree with Appellant that the trial court’s judgment failed to take into account Appellee’s attorneys’ concession that 5.25 hours should be deducted from the amount claimed, we reverse the judgment and remand with instructions that the trial court enter an amended judgment deducting $2,375 from the attorney’s fee award.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

Seevers v. Montiel, 73 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17221, 2011 WL 5120146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

73 So. 3d 336 (Seevers v. Montiel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related