Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Seevers v. Montiel

Seevers v. Montiel

73 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17221, 2011 WL 5120146
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 2011
DocketNo. 1D11-0371
StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 3d 336 (Seevers v. Montiel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seevers v. Montiel, 73 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17221, 2011 WL 5120146 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lois M. Seevers, seeks review of the trial court’s Supplemental Final Judgment of Attorney’s Fees and Costs and raises several arguments on appeal, only one of which has merit. Because we agree with Appellant that the trial court’s judgment failed to take into account Appellee’s attorneys’ concession that 5.25 hours should be deducted from the amount claimed, we reverse the judgment and remand with instructions that the trial court enter an amended judgment deducting $2,375 from the attorney’s fee award.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schantz v. Sekine
60 So. 3d 444 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 3d 336, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17221, 2011 WL 5120146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seevers-v-montiel-fladistctapp-2011.