Seery v. Throop

117 A. 161, 93 N.J. Eq. 646, 8 Stock. 646, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 342
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 28, 1922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justioe, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen,, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seery v. Throop, 117 A. 161, 93 N.J. Eq. 646, 8 Stock. 646, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 342 (N.J. 1922).

117 A. 161 (Seery v. Throop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.