Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Seery v. Throop

Seery v. Throop

117 A. 161, 93 N.J. Eq. 646, 8 Stock. 646, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 342
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 28, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 117 A. 161 (Seery v. Throop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seery v. Throop, 117 A. 161, 93 N.J. Eq. 646, 8 Stock. 646, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 342 (N.J. 1922).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Backes in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justioe, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen,, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 15. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A. 161, 93 N.J. Eq. 646, 8 Stock. 646, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seery-v-throop-nj-1922.