Seep v. Spade
179 F. 77, 102 C.C.A. 371, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4612
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 11, 1910·No. No. 3,067·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The essential facts in this case are like those in Midland Oil Company et al. v. Susan Turner (just decided) 179 Fed. 74, and there is a stipulation' that this case shall abide the result of the other.
It is therefore remanded to the Circuit Court fór a like modification of the decree, and, as so modified, the decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seep v. Spade, 179 F. 77, 102 C.C.A. 371, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4612 (8th Cir. 1910).
179 F. 77 (Seep v. Spade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitebird v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.
28 F.2d 200 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1928)
Hampton v. Ewert
22 F.2d 81 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)