Seeman v. Trustees of Columbia University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seeman v. Trustees of Columbia University

221 A.D.2d 211, 633 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11612

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 221 A.D.2d 211 (Seeman v. Trustees of Columbia University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seeman v. Trustees of Columbia University, 221 A.D.2d 211, 633 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11612 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about August 5, 1994, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s claims that defendant did not provide her with enough patients to complete the clinical requirements for graduation, and that defendant’s decision not to certify her for graduation in time to take the board examination was arbitrary and made in bad faith, have no support in the record and fail to raise any issues of fact requiring a trial. Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.), entered on or about August 5, 1994, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s claims that defendant did not provide her with enough patients to complete the clinical requirements for graduation, and that defendant’s decision not to certify her for graduation in time to take the board examination was arbitrary and made in bad faith, have no support in the record and fail to raise any issues of fact requiring a trial. Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 211, 633 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seeman-v-trustees-of-columbia-university-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack