Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN
241 S.E.2d 844
This text of 241 S.E.2d 844 (Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN, 241 S.E.2d 844 (N.C. 1978).
Opinion
SEEMAN PRINTERY, INC.
v.
Philip C. SCHINLAN, Individually and d/b/a Von Press.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger & Jonas, for defendant.
Mount, White, King, Hutson, Walker & Carden, for plaintiff.
Defendant's notice of appeal under GS 7A-30, 34 N.C.App. 637, 239 S.E.2d 744, dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seeman Printery, Inc. v. Schinhan
239 S.E.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
241 S.E.2d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seeman-printery-inc-v-schinlan-nc-1978.