Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN
241 S.E.2d 844
Opinion
SEEMAN PRINTERY, INC.
v.
Philip C. SCHINLAN, Individually and d/b/a Von Press.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger & Jonas, for defendant.
Mount, White, King, Hutson, Walker & Carden, for plaintiff.
Defendant's notice of appeal under GS 7A-30, 34 N.C.App. 637, 239 S.E.2d 744, dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN, 241 S.E.2d 844 (N.C. 1978).
241 S.E.2d 844 (Seeman Printery, Inc. v. SCHINLAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seeman Printery, Inc. v. Schinhan
239 S.E.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)