Seely v. State of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Seely v. State of Arizona

40 P.2d 1119, 45 Ariz. 208, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 221

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 11, 1935

DocketCriminal No. 818.

StatusPublished

This text of 40 P.2d 1119 (Seely v. State of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seely v. State of Arizona, 40 P.2d 1119, 45 Ariz. 208, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 221 (Ark. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Carl Seely was informed against by the county attorney of Pima county for the crime of robbery. He was duly tried to a jury, which found him guilty, and he was sentenced to serve a term in the state prison. From the verdict and judgment he appealed. No reporter's transcript appears in the case, nor is there a brief which suggests any errors which it is desired that we should review. Notwithstanding this, we have examined the record for fundamental error, but find none therein.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. *Page 209

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carl Seely was informed against by the county attorney of Pima county for the crime of robbery. He was duly tried to a jury, which found him guilty, and he was sentenced to serve a term in the state prison. From the verdict and judgment he appealed. No reporter's transcript appears in the case, nor is there a brief which suggests any errors which it is desired that we should review. Notwithstanding this, we have examined the record for fundamental error, but find none therein.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. *Page 209

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 P.2d 1119, 45 Ariz. 208, 1935 Ariz. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seely-v-state-of-arizona-ariz-1935.