Seely v. Hertz Corp.

231 So. 2d 547, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6951
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 1970
DocketNo. 69-293
StatusPublished

This text of 231 So. 2d 547 (Seely v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seely v. Hertz Corp., 231 So. 2d 547, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6951 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Volk v. Goetz
206 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper
190 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 So. 2d 547, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seely-v-hertz-corp-fladistctapp-1970.