Seely v. Hertz Corp.
231 So. 2d 547, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6951
Opinion
We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seely v. Hertz Corp., 231 So. 2d 547, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6951 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
231 So. 2d 547 (Seely v. Hertz Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Volk v. Goetz
206 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cloud v. Fallis
110 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper
190 So. 2d 12 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)