Seelke, Wendy Renee
This text of Seelke, Wendy Renee (Seelke, Wendy Renee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-40,196-03
EX PARTE WENDY RENEE SEELKE, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 43885-C IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY
Per curiam. ORDER
Applicant filed, pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, a pro se habeas application (No. WR-40,196-03), which this Court denied on September
16, 2015. Before this final disposition, Petitioner Michael Parker filed in the trial court a
supplemental habeas application on Applicant’s behalf. See Ex parte Rendon, 326 S.W.3d 221 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2010). Because the filing of the supplement was before final disposition of the pro se
habeas application by this Court, the supplement was timely filed in the -03 habeas proceeding. See
TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. Art. 11.07 §§ 3, 4. The supplement, however, is non-compliant with the
Rules of Appellate Procedure because it alters the form application to raise multiple grounds on a
single page. See Ex parte Blacklock, 191 S.W.3d 718 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); TEX . R. APP . PROC.
73.1 and 73.2. The -03 habeas proceeding is reopened on this Court’s own motion. Applicant’s pro
se claims remain denied. The supplemental claims are dismissed.
Filed: October 14, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Seelke, Wendy Renee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seelke-wendy-renee-texcrimapp-2015.