Seekford v. Buckley

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 22, 2015·No. Civil Action No. 2015-0962·Published

Opinion

FILED

JUN 2 2 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk. u.s. District & Bankruptcy FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Courts for the District of Columbia

) STANLEY SEEKFORD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case: 1:15-cv-00962 V ) Assigned To : Unassigned ' ) Assign. Date ; 6/22/2015 _ D AVID BUCKLEY ) Description: Pro Se Gen. ClVIl ( F Deck) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff is “seeking criminal charges” against the defendants “for violations of federal codes (18 US code 1512(a)(b)(c)(d).” Compl. at 1. There is no private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1512, however. See, e.g., Peavey v. Holder, 657 F. Supp. 2d 180, 190-91 (D.D.C. 2009), afl’d, No. 09—5389, 2010 WL 3155823 (DC. Cir. Aug. 9, 2010) (per curiam). The complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and therefore it will be

dismissed. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: (o/M/Hf J t -

United States District Ju ge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seekford v. Buckley, (D.D.C. 2015).

Seekford v. Buckley (Seekford v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peavey v. Holder
657 F. Supp. 2d 180 (District of Columbia, 2009)