Seeker v. State

674 So. 2d 853, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5439, 1996 WL 263408
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 1996
DocketNo. 95-421
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 674 So. 2d 853 (Seeker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seeker v. State, 674 So. 2d 853, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5439, 1996 WL 263408 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions in this direct appeal without discussion. Because the trial court imposed costs on a per count basis, however, we strike the duplica-tive costs. Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). In addition, we strike the public defender’s lien because it was imposed without informing appellant of his right to contest the lien amount. L.A.D. v. State, 616 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 624 So.2d 268 (Fla.1993). The lien may be imposed on remand if appellant is given the appropriate notice and opportunity to contest the amount of the lien.

Accordingly, the cause is affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MINER, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brenton McNeil v. State of Florida
215 So. 3d 55 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
McNeil v. State
162 So. 3d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 853, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5439, 1996 WL 263408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seeker-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.