Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co.

241 U.S. 646, 36 S. Ct. 451
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 20, 1916·No. No. 294·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380; (2) Mississippi & Red River Boom Co. v. Patterson, 98 U. S. 403; Madisonville Traction Co. v. St. Bernard Mining Co., 196 [647] U. S. 239; Mason City &c. Railroad v. Boynton, 204 U. S. 570; (3) Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. Chicago, 166 U. S. 226, 244-245; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 593; Backus v. Fort Street Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557, 569; (4) Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Hairston v. Danville & Western Ry., 208 U. S. 598; O’Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 253-254.

Mr. C. L. Bass, Mr. T. T. VanderHoeven and Mr. Joseph W. Bailey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Floyd McGown for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co., 241 U.S. 646, 36 S. Ct. 451 (1916).

241 U.S. 646 (Seekatz v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boom Co. v. Patterson
98 U.S. 403 (Supreme Court, 1879)
Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley
164 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Chicago
166 U.S. 226 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Bauman v. Ross
167 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1897)
Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.
169 U.S. 557 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad v. Boynton
204 U.S. 570 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.
208 U.S. 598 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce
235 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1914)
O'NEILL v. Leamer
239 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court, 1915)