Seegitz v. McKinley
248 A.D. 635
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 635 (Seegitz v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seegitz v. McKinley, 248 A.D. 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Order of filiation of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Richmond, and order denying motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seegitz-v-mckinley-nyappdiv-1936.