Seedman v. Bondy & Schloss
This text of 201 A.D.2d 287 (Seedman v. Bondy & Schloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered July 12, 1993, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for consolidation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Upon comparing the allegations of the complaints in the two actions, we find that defendants’ valuations and reporting of the leaseholds in question and the effect thereof on the tax liability of the plaintiffs in both actions is a central and common issue to both actions, and that defendants-appellants’ opposition to consolidation does not demonstrate prejudice to a substantial right. Concur — Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D.2d 287, 608 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seedman-v-bondy-schloss-nyappdiv-1994.