Seeck & Kade, Inc. v. Tomshinsky
200 N.E. 23, 269 N.Y. 613, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1416
This text of 200 N.E. 23 (Seeck & Kade, Inc. v. Tomshinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seeck & Kade, Inc. v. Tomshinsky, 200 N.E. 23, 269 N.Y. 613, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1416 (N.Y. 1936).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Doubleday, Doran & Co. v. Macy & Co. (269 N. Y. 272). No opinion.
Concur; Crañe, Ch, J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lilly Co. v. . Saunders
4 S.E.2d 528 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Bourjois Sales Corp. v. Dorfman
7 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
200 N.E. 23, 269 N.Y. 613, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seeck-kade-inc-v-tomshinsky-ny-1936.