Seeberger v. Putnam Co., Inc.
155 N.E. 891, 244 N.Y. 545, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 705
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seeberger v. Putnam Co., Inc., 155 N.E. 891, 244 N.Y. 545, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 705 (N.Y. 1926).
155 N.E. 891 (Seeberger v. Putnam Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howard Converters, Inc. v. French Art Mills, Inc.
7 N.E.2d 115 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)