Seebeck v. Finetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seebeck v. Finetta

179 A.D.2d 805, 580 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 805 (Seebeck v. Finetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seebeck v. Finetta, 179 A.D.2d 805, 580 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff Roseanne Seebeck and the defendant, coemployees, were both acting in the course of their mutual employment when the defendant’s automobile struck Roseanne (see, Matter of Husted v Seneca Steel Serv., 41 NY2d 140; Kunze v Jones, 6 AD2d 888, affd 8 NY2d 1152; Smithline v Ghessi, 25 AD2d 841; Pantolo v Lane, 185 Misc 221). Summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the defendant since workers’ compensation is the exclusive remedy available to the injured plaintiff (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff Roseanne Seebeck and the defendant, coemployees, were both acting in the course of their mutual employment when the defendant’s automobile struck Roseanne (see, Matter of Husted v Seneca Steel Serv., 41 NY2d 140; Kunze v Jones, 6 AD2d 888, affd 8 NY2d 1152; Smithline v Ghessi, 25 AD2d 841; Pantolo v Lane, 185 Misc 221). Summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the defendant since workers’ compensation is the exclusive remedy available to the injured plaintiff (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.D.2d 805, 580 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seebeck-v-finetta-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack