Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Andrea Seebach, No. 2:18-cv-00109-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 | BMW of North America, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Andrea Seebach’s ex parte application to set a hearing is denied. Contrary to her 18 | claims in that application, costs were taxed under the procedure defined in this District’s Local 19 | Rules. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 292; Bill of Costs, ECF No. 28; Objections, ECF No. 29; Response, 20 | ECF No. 34. To the extent her ex parte application is intended as a request to reconsider the 21 | court’s order at ECF No. 40, it is denied. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230())(3); Am. Ironworks & 22 | Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: March 15, 2021. 25 26 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE