Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC
Opinion
Andrea Seebach, No. 2:18-cv-00109-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. BMW of North America, LLC, Defendant. Plaintiff Andrea Seebach’s ex parte application to set a hearing is denied. Contrary to her claims in that application, costs were taxed under the procedure defined in this District’s Local Rules. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 292; Bill of Costs, ECF No. 28; Objections, ECF No. 29; Response, ECF No. 34. To the extent her ex parte application is intended as a request to reconsider the court’s order at ECF No. 40, it is denied. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230())(3); Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001). DATED: March 15, 2021. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC (Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.