Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 16, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-00109·Unknown

Opinion

Andrea Seebach, No. 2:18-cv-00109-KJM-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. BMW of North America, LLC, Defendant. Plaintiff Andrea Seebach’s ex parte application to set a hearing is denied. Contrary to her claims in that application, costs were taxed under the procedure defined in this District’s Local Rules. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 292; Bill of Costs, ECF No. 28; Objections, ECF No. 29; Response, ECF No. 34. To the extent her ex parte application is intended as a request to reconsider the court’s order at ECF No. 40, it is denied. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230())(3); Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001). DATED: March 15, 2021. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC (Seebach v. BMW of North America, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.