See v. Partridge

The Superior Court of New York City

See v. Partridge

2 Duer 463

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedDecember 10, 1853

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 Duer 463 (See v. Partridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

See v. Partridge, 2 Duer 463 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

We think that all the questions that have been argued before us were rightly decided by the judge at special term ; and we deem it unnecessary to state any reasons for our opinion, in addition to those which he has given. He might, with entire propriety, have left the parties to bear separately their own costs, but the mode in which he has exercised his discretion in relation to the costs, is not an error, if an error at all, of which the defendant has any right to complain. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

We think that all the questions that have been argued before us were rightly decided by the judge at special term ; and we deem it unnecessary to state any reasons for our opinion, in addition to those which he has given. He might, with entire propriety, have left the parties to bear separately their own costs, but the mode in which he has exercised his discretion in relation to the costs, is not an error, if an error at all, of which the defendant has any right to complain. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Duer 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/see-v-partridge-nysuperctnyc-1853.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack