Sedrick Latroy McKinney v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium

562 F. App'x 917
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 2014
Docket12-12953
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 562 F. App'x 917 (Sedrick Latroy McKinney v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sedrick Latroy McKinney v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium, 562 F. App'x 917 (11th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

HULL, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Sedrick McKinney appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, which he attempted to bring pursuant to the “savings clause” in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). In 1993, McKinney was sentenced to 262 months *918 imprisonment for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). In October 2012, McKinney finished serving his full 262-month federal term of imprisonment, was released from custody, and is now serving his five years’ of supervised release. McKinney asks that his supervised release be terminated.

After review of the record, the briefs of the parties and the amicus, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s denial of McKinney’s § 2241 petition.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glover A. Yawn v. FCC Coleman - Medium Warden
615 F. App'x 644 (Eleventh Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
562 F. App'x 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sedrick-latroy-mckinney-v-warden-fcc-coleman-medium-ca11-2014.