Sedore v. Landfair
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
SCOTT SEDORE, Case No. 21-12935
Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge
SIRENA LANDFAIR, et al., Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. ____________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MAY 17, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 47)
Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris’s May 17, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 47). Magistrate Judge Morris recommends granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 47, 37). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 47), GRANTS defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 37), and
DISMISSES the complaint with prejudice SO ORDERED. Date: June 13, 2023 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sedore v. Landfair (Sedore v. Landfair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.