Sedore v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. Michigan·Decided June 8, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-10311·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

SCOTT SEDORE, Case No. 19-10311

Plaintiff, Stephanie Dawkins Davis v. United States District Judge

SHERMAN CAMPBELL, et al.,

Defendants. __________________________ /

OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MARCH 30, 2021 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 70)

Currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen’s March 30, 2021 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 70). Judge Whalen recommends denying plaintiff’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement. The Court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The Court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 70) and DENIES the motion to

enforcement the settlement agreement. (ECF No. 66). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 8, 2021 s/Stephanie Dawkins Davis Stephanie Dawkins Davis United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sedore v. Campbell, (E.D. Mich. 2021).

Sedore v. Campbell (Sedore v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)