Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2026·No. 24-3367·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY B. SEDLIK, an individual, No. 24-3367 D.C. No. Appellant, 2:21-cv-01102-DSF-MRW Central District of California, v. Los Angeles KATHERINE VON DRACHENBERG, ORDER AKA Kat Von D, an individual; KAT VON D, INC., a California corporation; HIGH VOLTAGE TATTOO, INC., a California corporation,

Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg, (9th Cir. 2026).

Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg (Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.