Sedita v. Verdi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sedita v. Verdi

293 A.D.2d 665, 740 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 293 A.D.2d 665 (Sedita v. Verdi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sedita v. Verdi, 293 A.D.2d 665, 740 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to the Dram Shop Act, the defendant Caffe Baci appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme [666]*666Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated May 14, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to the Dram Shop Act, the defendant Caffe Baci appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme [666]*666Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated May 14, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 665, 740 N.Y.S.2d 643, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sedita-v-verdi-nyappdiv-2002.