Sedgwick v. Sedgwick

4 P. 570, 2 Cal. Unrep. 363
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 29, 1884
DocketNo. 8697
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 P. 570 (Sedgwick v. Sedgwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sedgwick v. Sedgwick, 4 P. 570, 2 Cal. Unrep. 363 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

By the COURT.

The executor or administrator of an estate of a deceased person has no authority to bid in for the estate, at execution sale, real or personal property levied upon to satisfy an execution issued upon a judgment in favor of the estate. The execution sale of the real estate of the defendant to the plaintiff, as executrix of the estate of Thomas Sedgwick, was therefore void. And as it did not, in law or fact, disturb the defendant in the possession of his land, and the executrix paid no money upon the sale, the defendant had no cause of action against the estate to recover damages resulting from the sale.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

San Domingo Gold Mining Co. v. Grand Pacific Gold Mining Co.
102 P. 548 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P. 570, 2 Cal. Unrep. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sedgwick-v-sedgwick-cal-1884.