Sedgwick v. Fridenberg

21 F. Cas. 977, 11 Blatchf. 77, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedApril 12, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 F. Cas. 977 (Sedgwick v. Fridenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sedgwick v. Fridenberg, 21 F. Cas. 977, 11 Blatchf. 77, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708 (circtsdny 1873).

Opinion

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

I have heretofore decided (In re Coleman [Case No. 2,979]; In re Place [Id. 11,201]) that, unless the appeal provided for in the eighth section of the bankrupt act, (14 Stat. 520,) be taken within ten days after the decree is entered, this court acquires no jurisdiction thereby.

I am satisfied, that the second section of the act of June 1st, 1S72, (17 Stat. 196,) has not changed the law in that particular. I have, therefore, no discretion and no alternative. I am compelled to grant the motion' to dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Judson v. Courier Co.
25 F. 705 (S.D. New York, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F. Cas. 977, 11 Blatchf. 77, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sedgwick-v-fridenberg-circtsdny-1873.