Sedgwick v. Fridenberg

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Sedgwick v. Fridenberg

21 F. Cas. 977, 11 Blatchf. 77, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 12, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

I have heretofore decided (In re Coleman [Case No. 2,979]; In re Place [Id. 11,201]) that, unless the appeal provided for in the eighth section of the bankrupt act, (14 Stat. 520,) be taken within ten days after the decree is entered, this court acquires no jurisdiction thereby.

I am satisfied, that the second section of the act of June 1st, 1S72, (17 Stat. 196,) has not changed the law in that particular. I have, therefore, no discretion and no alternative. I am compelled to grant the motion' to dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

I have heretofore decided (In re Coleman [Case No. 2,979]; In re Place [Id. 11,201]) that, unless the appeal provided for in the eighth section of the bankrupt act, (14 Stat. 520,) be taken within ten days after the decree is entered, this court acquires no jurisdiction thereby.

I am satisfied, that the second section of the act of June 1st, 1S72, (17 Stat. 196,) has not changed the law in that particular. I have, therefore, no discretion and no alternative. I am compelled to grant the motion' to dismiss the appeal.

Sedgwick v. Fridenberg, 21 F. Cas. 977, 11 Blatchf. 77, 1873 U.S. App. LEXIS 1708 (circtsdny 1873).

Pincite

21 F. Cas. 977 (Sedgwick v. Fridenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related