Sedgwick v. Culp

24 Colo. App. 566
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 15, 1913
DocketNo. 3765
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Colo. App. 566 (Sedgwick v. Culp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sedgwick v. Culp, 24 Colo. App. 566 (Colo. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinions

Bell, J.

This action was brought by John Sedgwick, as plaintiff, against Jerome F. Culp and James B. Jackson, defendants, for the purpose of quieting the title in said Sedgwick to one-half of section 19, twp. 11, N. of R. 61 W. of 6 p. m., in Weld county, Colorado.

At the trial plaintiff offered in evidence, as color of title, a treasurer’s tax deed to the land in question without showing that notice of the intention of said Sedgwick to apply for a treasurer’s deed had been given as required by law, or that the assessed value of the property was such as to make the giving of notice unnecessary. The tax deed was admitted to be void upon its face. The deed offered was excluded by the court, and, thereupon, the plaintiff was denied the benefit of his plea of the statute of limitation based upon his possession and payment of taxes for seven successive years under claim and color of title made in good faith.

[567]*567At this term of court, in the case of James B. Jackson v. Eric Larson et al., No. '3789, the identical treasurer’s deed here involved was under consideration, and was held to be admissible in evidence as color of title, and the decision in that case on that point is decisive of this case also, and for the reasons here given we hold that the court erred in excluding said deed as evidence of color of title, and the judgment must be reversed.

Reversed and Remanded.

Cunningham, P. J., dissenting.

King, J., specially concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Law
102 U.S. 461 (Supreme Court, 1880)
Lebanon Mining Co. of New York v. Rogers
8 Colo. 34 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1884)
Knight v. Lawrence
19 Colo. 425 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1894)
De Foresta v. Gast
20 Colo. 307 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1894)
Bennet v. North Colorado Springs Land & Improvement Co.
23 Colo. 470 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1897)
Richards v. Beggs
31 Colo. 186 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1903)
Williams v. Conroy
35 Colo. 117 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1905)
Walters v. Webster
123 P. 952 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1912)
Silford v. Stratton
54 Colo. 248 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)
McConnel v. Street
17 Ill. 253 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1855)
Bowman v. Wettig
39 Ill. 416 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1866)
Dalton v. Lucas
63 Ill. 337 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1872)
Hardin v. Gouveneur
69 Ill. 140 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1873)
Davis v. Hall
92 Ill. 85 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1879)
Miller v. Pence
23 N.E. 1030 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1890)
Sexson v. Barker
50 N.E. 109 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Colo. App. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sedgwick-v-culp-coloctapp-1913.