Seddon v. Donald

12 N.Y.S. 719, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 848

This text of 12 N.Y.S. 719 (Seddon v. Donald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seddon v. Donald, 12 N.Y.S. 719, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 848 (superctny 1891).

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The plaintiffs, at. the close of the case, made no motion for the direction of a verdict in their favor. The issues were submitted to the jury under a charge to which no exception was taken. The jury having found for the defendant, the plaintiffs moved generally for a new trial, but stated no ground for their motion. Moreover, there is no certificate that the case contains all the evidence. Under these circumstances, no question of fact can be reviewed. The exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence have been examined, but none of them constitutes sufficient ground for reversal. The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 N.Y.S. 719, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seddon-v-donald-superctny-1891.