Sedbury v. Southern Express Co.

164 N.C. 363
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 17, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 164 N.C. 363 (Sedbury v. Southern Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sedbury v. Southern Express Co., 164 N.C. 363 (N.C. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are unable to determine tbe questions at issue in this cause for tbe reason that tbe facts agreed upon contain no finding that tbe money was taken while tbe valise was in tbe care or control of defendant company. In its ordinary acceptation, a judgment is tbe conclusion of tbe law upon facts admitted or in some way established, and, without this essential fact, tbe Court is not in a position to make final decision on tbe rights of tbe parties. Bryant v. Insurance Co., 141 N. C., 181. Tbe cause will be remanded, that tbe determinative facts may-be established. Tbe costs will be equally divided between tbe parties.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re T.K.
613 S.E.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance
62 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 N.C. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sedbury-v-southern-express-co-nc-1913.