Sedbury v. Southern Express Co.

164 N.C. 363
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 17, 1913·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are unable to determine tbe questions at issue in this cause for tbe reason that tbe facts agreed upon contain no finding that tbe money was taken while tbe valise was in tbe care or control of defendant company. In its ordinary acceptation, a judgment is tbe conclusion of tbe law upon facts admitted or in some way established, and, without this essential fact, tbe Court is not in a position to make final decision on tbe rights of tbe parties. Bryant v. Insurance Co., 141 N. C., 181. Tbe cause will be remanded, that tbe determinative facts may-be established. Tbe costs will be equally divided between tbe parties.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sedbury v. Southern Express Co., 164 N.C. 363 (N.C. 1913).

164 N.C. 363 (Sedbury v. Southern Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re T.K.
613 S.E.2d 739 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance
62 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)