Sedbury v. . Express Co.

79 S.E. 288, 164 N.C. 363, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 62
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 17, 1913·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Action, heard on appeal from a justice's court. The action was to recover the sum of $13 and interest, being an amount of money lost from a valise which had been intrusted with defendant company for shipment from Fayetteville to Tarboro, N.C. and for a penalty in failing to adjust the claim within the time required by law, as provided by ch. 139, Laws 1911.

In the Superior Court the case was submitted on case agreed upon, and judgment having been entered in plaintiff's favor for the claim and the statutory penalty, defendant excepted and appealed. We are unable to determine the questions at issue in this cause for the reason that the facts agreed upon contain no finding that the money was taken while the valise was in the care or control of defendant company. In its ordinary acceptation, a judgment is the conclusion of the law upon facts admitted or in some was established, and, without this essential fact, the Court is not in a position to make final decision on the rights of the parties. Bryant v. Insurance Co., 147 N.C. 181. The cause will be remanded, that the determinative facts may be established. The costs will be equally divided between the parties.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sedbury v. . Express Co., 79 S.E. 288, 164 N.C. 363, 1913 N.C. LEXIS 62 (N.C. 1913).

79 S.E. 288 (Sedbury v. . Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance
62 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
In Re the Will of York
55 S.E.2d 791 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Eborn v. . Ellis
35 S.E.2d 238 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)