Seda v. Board of Education

2 A.D.2d 666, 152 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5070
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 1956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment appealed from is perforce based on a finding that the infant plaintiff fell while jumping for the horizontal bar. The evidence in this ease however impels us to find that he fell not while jumping for the bar but while he was in the act of swinging on it. In these circumstances no liability may be imposed upon the defendant (Miller v. Board of Educ., 249 App. Div. 738). Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and judgment is directed to he entered in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint herein. Settle order on jiotiee, Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, Cox, Frank and Valente, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seda v. Board of Education, 2 A.D.2d 666, 152 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

2 A.D.2d 666 (Seda v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruiz ex rel. Ruiz v. Westbrooke Lake Homes, Inc.
559 So. 2d 1172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Iannacone ex rel. Iannacone v. City of North Miami Beach
123 So. 2d 755 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)