Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel Link Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel Link Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 685 F. App'x 979
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 8, 2016·No. 16-1372·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant

v.

GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION, Appellee ______________________

2016-1372, 2016-1373 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-00493, IPR2014-00749. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DANIEL C. TUCKER.

BYRON LEROY PICKARD, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by LORI A. GORDON, MICHAEL BRADLEY RAY, MICHAEL D. SPECHT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel Link Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel Link Corporation (Securus Technologies, Inc. v. Global Tel Link Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.