Security Trust Co. v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 983, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2133
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 23, 1926
DocketDocket No. 6720.
StatusPublished

This text of 4 B.T.A. 983 (Security Trust Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Security Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 983, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2133 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[984]*984OPINION.

Maeqttette:

The amount of $1,500 paid by the executor of the estate of Mary Caplis to Thomas Markey, as set forth in the findings of fact, should be allowed as a deduction in determining the net estate subject to the Federal estate tax. At the hearing, the peti; tioners abandoned their claim for the deduction of the amount of $324,825.98, representing the residue of decedent’s estate now held by the Security Trust Co. as trustee under the terms of the decedent’s last will and testament.

Order of redetermination will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Security Trust Co.
4 B.T.A. 983 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 983, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-trust-co-v-commissioner-bta-1926.