Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co. v. Superior Court

128 Cal. App. 781
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 12, 1933
DocketCiv. No. 8683
StatusPublished

This text of 128 Cal. App. 781 (Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co. v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co. v. Superior Court, 128 Cal. App. 781 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

CRAIG, J.

A receiver having been appointed by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County at the instance of a creditor of Long Beach Escrow and Title Company, a corporation, in an action founded upon a promissory note, the instant proceeding was instituted praying a writ of prohibition to restrain said court and receiver from marshaling and distributing the assets of said corporation, in such receivership matter.

The principles announced in Moore v. Superior Court, 127 Cal. App. 692 [16 Pac. (2d) 324], decided November 26, 1932, are in all essentials applicable to the proceeding before us at this time, and require us to hold that the order appointing a receiver and all proceedings had thereunder were null and void.

The writ is granted as prayed.

Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Superior Court
16 P.2d 324 (California Court of Appeal, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 Cal. App. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-title-insurance-guarantee-co-v-superior-court-calctapp-1933.