Security State Bank of Mooreland v. First Nat. Bank of Woodward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Security State Bank of Mooreland v. First Nat. Bank of Woodward

1923 OK 219, 213 P. 874, 89 Okla. 180, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1037

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 17, 1923

Docket9893

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 219 (Security State Bank of Mooreland v. First Nat. Bank of Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Security State Bank of Mooreland v. First Nat. Bank of Woodward, 1923 OK 219, 213 P. 874, 89 Okla. 180, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1037 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

PER OURIAM.

Defendant in error in Its petition for rehearing complains that the opinion of the court was handed down before the time expired in which to file brief.

On the 27th day of June, 1921, it was stipulated that defendant in error has until the first day of July, 1921, in which to file brief, which was filed on the 28th day of June, 1921, and on the same day the opinion of the court was handed down. The attention of the court was not called to this brief at the time the case was decided, as clearly appears from the opinion, and for this reason we have considered the questions raised in the brief just as though no opinion had ever been rendered in the case.

After a careful review of the record, briefs, and petition to rehear, the court adheres to its former opinion, and the petition to rehear is denied.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Petition for Rehearing.

PER OURIAM.

Defendant in error in Its petition for rehearing complains that the opinion of the court was handed down before the time expired in which to file brief.

On the 27th day of June, 1921, it was stipulated that defendant in error has until the first day of July, 1921, in which to file brief, which was filed on the 28th day of June, 1921, and on the same day the opinion of the court was handed down. The attention of the court was not called to this brief at the time the case was decided, as clearly appears from the opinion, and for this reason we have considered the questions raised in the brief just as though no opinion had ever been rendered in the case.

After a careful review of the record, briefs, and petition to rehear, the court adheres to its former opinion, and the petition to rehear is denied.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 219, 213 P. 874, 89 Okla. 180, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-state-bank-of-mooreland-v-first-nat-bank-of-woodward-okla-1923.