Security Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Supervisors

34 P. 437, 4 Cal. Unrep. 222, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1062
California Supreme Court·Decided August 31, 1893·No. Nos. 14,885, 14,886, 14,887·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Farmers & Merchants’ Bank v. Board of Equalization, 97 Cal. 318, 32 Pac. 312, most of the ques[224] tions involved in this appeal were determined adversely to the respondent. The additional point now presented, that the legislature could not confer upon the state hoard of equalization authority to extend the time within which the county board of equalization could act, must also, under the principles declared in that c.ase, be determined against the respondent ; and, upon the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Security Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 34 P. 437, 4 Cal. Unrep. 222, 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1062 (Cal. 1893).

34 P. 437 (Security Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rancho Santa Margarita v. County of San Diego
26 P.2d 716 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Baker v. Lenhart
195 N.W. 16 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)
Mogaard v. Robinson
187 N.W. 142 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1922)
In Re McClaskey
1894 OK 27 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1894)