Security Mutual Insurance Co. v. Maria

433 A.2d 693, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1380
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 30, 1981·No. No. 81-29-A·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This case is here on appeal from a Superi- or Court judgment wherein it was determined that recovery under the “hit and run” provisions of an uninsured motorist policy was precluded in the absence of physical contact between the insured’s vehicle and that of the unidentified motorist. The briefing requirements herein were stayed pending our decision in Pin Pin H. Su. v. Kemper Insurance Companies/American Motorists Insurance Company, 431 A.2d 416 (R.I.1981) wherein this same issue was before us. In Pin Pin, we decided that the insurance policy requirement of physical contact in these cases is void as against the policy inherent in the uninsured-motorist statute.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Superi- or Court is hereby vacated and this case is remanded to the Superior Court for reconsideration in light of Pin Pin H. Su.

WEISBERGER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Security Mutual Insurance Co. v. Maria, 433 A.2d 693, 1981 R.I. LEXIS 1380 (R.I. 1981).

433 A.2d 693 (Security Mutual Insurance Co. v. Maria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Su v. Kemper Insurance Companies/American Motorists Insurance
431 A.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1981)