Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Blackwell

129 S.E. 576, 34 Ga. App. 462, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 318

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1925

Docket16557; 16558

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 576 (Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Blackwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Blackwell, 129 S.E. 576, 34 Ga. App. 462, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 318 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

These two cases were suits to recover real-estate agents’ commissions, and were tried together, but are here on separate writs or error (which will be considered jointly), complaining of the judgment overruling and denying the respective motions for new trial.

The evidence authorized the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant in each of- the cases in the court below. The special assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court, when the charge is read in its entirety and applied to the issue in the two cases, are without merit. The cases have been legally tried, and for no reason pointed out in the records did the court err in overruling the motions for new trial.

Judgments affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

These two cases were suits to recover real-estate agents’ commissions, and were tried together, but are here on separate writs or error (which will be considered jointly), complaining of the judgment overruling and denying the respective motions for new trial.

The evidence authorized the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant in each of- the cases in the court below. The special assignments of error upon excerpts from the charge of the court, when the charge is read in its entirety and applied to the issue in the two cases, are without merit. The cases have been legally tried, and for no reason pointed out in the records did the court err in overruling the motions for new trial.

Judgments affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.E. 576, 34 Ga. App. 462, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-loan-trust-co-v-blackwell-gactapp-1925.