Security Insurance Co. v. Webster

357 So. 2d 741, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15393
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 1978
DocketNo. 77-96
StatusPublished

This text of 357 So. 2d 741 (Security Insurance Co. v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Security Insurance Co. v. Webster, 357 So. 2d 741, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellants seek review of a summary judgment for appellees in a suit on two fire [742]*742insurance policies. Five points have been presented for our consideration. However, we find it necessary to consider only two.

Appellants’ first point is that there was a genuine issue of material fact involving whether the appellees’ building was a total loss after the fire. We agree that the record does not conclusively show that the building was a total loss, and that is the test. Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 351 So.2d 29 (Fla.1977).

The other point which we believe should be mentioned involves the trial court’s allowance of attorney’s fees to ap-pellees in the amount of $40,000. While the trial court held a full blown evidentiary hearing on the question of attorney’s fees and no doubt took into consideration the various factors to be considered in fixing an attorney’s fee, the amount allowed amounts to $500 per hour for 80 hours.

We recently had an opportunity to discuss the allowance of attorney’s fees in two eminent domain cases.1 In the light of what was said there we hold the award in this case is excessive. Of course, the entire award of fees to appellees at this stage of the proceedings must be set aside'in view of our decision to reverse on Point I. However, we considered the amount of the award simply for the future guidance of the trial court.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wills v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
351 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, ETC. v. Denmark
354 So. 2d 100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, ETC. v. Denmark
356 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 So. 2d 741, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-insurance-co-v-webster-fladistctapp-1978.