Security Guard & Patrol Service, Inc. v. Jones

170 So. 2d 40
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 1964
DocketNo. 33821
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 170 So. 2d 40 (Security Guard & Patrol Service, Inc. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Security Guard & Patrol Service, Inc. v. Jones, 170 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 10, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marhoefer v. Frye
199 So. 2d 723 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 So. 2d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-guard-patrol-service-inc-v-jones-fla-1964.