Security-First National Bank v. Southern Citrus Ass'n

117 P.2d 955, 47 Cal. App. 2d 862, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1250
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 14, 1941·No. Civ. No. 13124·Published

Opinion

MOORE, P. J.

The facts of this case are the same as those set forth in our opinion in Security-First National Bank v. Hauer, No. 13125, ante, p. 302 [117 Pac. (2d) 952], this day filed., Defendant has attempted to appeal from the judgment entered on January 8, 1941, in favor of plaintiff. That judgment, however, was regularly set aside on defendant’s own motion on January 20, 1941. As a result the attempted appeal from that judgment is ineffectual.

The purported appeal from the judgment and order is, therefore, dismissed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Security-First National Bank v. Southern Citrus Ass'n, 117 P.2d 955, 47 Cal. App. 2d 862, 1941 Cal. App. LEXIS 1250 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941).

117 P.2d 955 (Security-First National Bank v. Southern Citrus Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Security-First National Bank v. Hauer
117 P.2d 952 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)