Home/Supreme Court/SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. Franchise Tax Board of California

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. Franchise Tax Board of California

368 U.S. 3, 82 S. Ct. 15
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 9, 1961
Docket122
StatusPublished

This text of 368 U.S. 3 (SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. Franchise Tax Board of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 368 U.S. 3, 82 S. Ct. 15 (1961).

Opinion

368 U.S. 3 (1961)

SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
v.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 122.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 9, 1961.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Pierce Works, Warren M. Christopher, Hugo A. Steinmeyer, Richard E. Sherwood and Brenton L. Metzler for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 U.S. 3, 82 S. Ct. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-first-national-bank-of-los-angeles-v-franchise-tax-board-of-scotus-1961.